DEFINITION OF 4PL

Fourth-Party Logistics
The concept of Fourth-Party Logistics (4PL) began to emerge around 1996 with the term being registered as a trademark, however, not having coined the phrase.

The definition of Fourth-Party Logistics (4PL) is an integrator that assembles the resources, capabilities and technology of its own organisation and other organisations to design, build and run comprehensive supply chain solutions.

In essence, Fourth-Party Logistics (4PL) means that one company is able to outsource the entire management of its supply chain to another company. This would include all the assets, planning, and management of the process. The 4PL management service provider would gather together all the constituent parts required such as systems, transport providers, order management, and inventory management with a view to providing the client with a fully integrated supply chain. In return, the client will pay an appropriate fee and concentrate on its core business. Fourth-Party Logistics (4 PL) presents a solution that incorporates the advantages of both outsourcing and insourcing to provide maximum overall benefit. Fourth-Party Logistics differs from traditional 3PL arrangements in four main aspects: All aspects of the clients’ supply chain are managed by the 4PL organisation; It acts as a single interface between the client and multiple logistics service providers; It is also possible for a major third party logistics provider to form a 4PL organization within its existing structure; and The 4PL organisation is often a separate entity established as a Joint Venture (JV) or long-term contract between a primary client and one or more partners. A separate management company is established as a JV or long-term contract between the primary client and at least one other partner, which contribute the start-up capital for the venture, as well as assets and expertise for ongoing operations. The 4PL organization is a supply chain integrator and acts as a single interface between clients and the full scope of supply chain services. It is staffed with the best skills from the founding partners and should regularly be assessed against global benchmarks. It can come in a variety of models, mainly as:

INDUSTRY SOLUTION MODEL

To co-ordinate and manage the distribution operations of its primary clients initially, and then those of other related companies within the industry.

SUPPLY CHAIN PARTNER MODEL

To manage an integrated industry supply chain consisting of manufacturers, material suppliers, 3PL providers and management consultants. Benefits of the 4PL organisation include: Improves accountability Retains corporate supply chain knowledge Realises revenue opportunities by selling the supply chain services to external clients Addresses operational failures of 3PL services because the new entity allows the creation of a totally new culture Addresses strategic failures of 3PL services with a single point of contact to manage all aspects of the client supply chain Addresses financial failures of 3PL services by releasing capital through selling logistics assets to the 4PL organisation or on the free market The 4PL concept addresses the shortfalls of traditional 3PL arrangements and offers the opportunity to achieve substantial incremental benefits. In addition, the concept can be extended to an existing 3PL, converting it into a 4PL. TSI Central Station’s assets are its “people”, and through their skill’s we have found our niche as the only truly independent 4PL Supply Chain Service Provider in South Africa.

4PL: Functions provided by a 4PL company Procurement Storage Distribution Processes A 4PL company takes over the logistics section of a business. This could be the entire process, or a side business that’s imperative to have as part of the main business. An example here would be a bicycle importer. The main function is to import bicycles however, they need to have spare parts for these unique bikes. A 4PL would manage the total logistic operations for the spare parts business.

Make 4PLs Work for You
Do you know which of your warehouses are the most cost-efficient? Can you see each shipment from procurement to fulfillment? Working with a partner with a full understanding of your supply chain can help you:

Gain end-to-end visibility. Getting a true picture of the supply chain is a top priority for organizations, but many current platforms can’t deliver. More than half of recently surveyed supply chain executives planned to invest more than $1 million in new technology. A 4PL can help you design and implement a cloud-based solution that pulls data from all internal and external sources, giving insight into each step of the process—regardless of who handles the shipment.
Optimize operations. Leveraging a broad set of capabilities and industry relationships, 4PLs customize full-service solutions based on what success looks like for each business. For one electronics manufacturer, that meant implementing a solution that would improve supply chain efficiency and visibility while still pushing data into its legacy ERP system. The company’s supply chain partner purpose-built a system that integrated seamlessly with the original platform, while creating new efficiencies through intelligent alerts to internal teams and retail stores.
Get data-driven insights and analytics. By acting as the keeper for all supply chain information, a 4PL can help you turn data into business intelligence. Customizable KPIs and reporting offer insights on staffing costs, service levels and more, helping you drive value throughout the supply chain. With cybersecurity threats like the recent WannaCry ransomware threatening businesses constantly, a 4PL that continually invests in its technology platform can also ensure your data stays secure.
Deliver value. Between economies of scale and multifunctional expertise, 4PLs help businesses find new ways to lower landed costs and minimize supply chain risks. The right supply chain partner takes full accountability for meeting your business rules and requirements, freeing you to focus on more high-value tasks.
When selecting a 4PL, consider how well they know your industry, their core capabilities and how they’ll service your business day-to-day. A successful relationship combines powerful technology, full-service logistics, and a keen eye for identifying and implementing processes that give you a competitive advantage.

Jon Slangerup is the chairman and CEO of America Global Logistics.


According to Barloworld Logistics in their article : Control Towers – Buzzword or Game Changing Supply Chain model? The latest hot topic within the supply chain lexicon is Control Towers. The name itself evokes images of air traffic controllers keeping a sharp eye over air traffic, and indeed the concept is very similar. Croydon Airport was the first to introduce an Air Traffic Control Tower in the 1920’s so that it had a literal birds-eye view of flights so that the airport could better support pilots and ground crew and mitigate the risk of accidents. The concept quickly caught on and evolved to the highly technical discipline we know today. Potential for Supply Chain In much the same way, supply chain control towers offer a consolidated view of the entire chain. They provide insight and alerts into events occurring throughout the chain. The model has further evolved into intelligent hubs that not only provide in-depth visibility but also collate, analyse and utilise data to make informed predictive, and indeed prescriptive, decisions right from the point of order through to delivery to end consumer, and even beyond. By definition a supply chain control tower is a tool, either digital or physical or a combination of both, that provides visibility across the entire supply chain both holistically and granularly. With the rise of supply chain networks, encompassing multi-party entities both up and downstream that are highly responsive to consumer demand, control towers are advancing beyond simple decision supporting visibility into autonomous control and decision making thanks to advancing artificial intelligence. The benefits it offers While control towers increasingly rely on technology to provide more sophisticated solutions, purely analytical towers typically only leverage planning and other data into a consolidated view often lacking the operational ability to action insights quickly. A true control tower should be a combination of both operational and data-driven capabilities, thereby marrying supply chain visibility and analytics with the ability to do something in real-time from an operational perspective. What does it look like? A supply chain can, from a high-level, be broken down into four main sections namely, purchase order, manufacture, distribution and transportation and future-focused control towers aim to provide visibility over all four from a centralised hub. From an operational point-of-view, a control tower provides visibility across all four steps, allowing for exception management to a very granular level. Dynamic inventory sourcing across multiple suppliers allows for the optimisation of transportation as well as internal capacity planning and SLA monitoring. Analytic capabilities provide the so-called “on-time, in-full” reporting capabilities, as well as a holistic view of the total-cost-to-serve, by accurately consolidating transport, supplier, activity and other costs on an individual SKU basis. The functionality provided by control tower models within a supply chain are impressive and can orchestrate entire supply networks to run more efficiently, providing benefit for all partners within the chain. The challenge lies in the mindset shift required by supply chain professionals to one of letting go of control to gain advantage. Read more about why outsourcing to a 4PL adds value There needs to be a realisation that a fulfilment partner, who owns and manages the entire chain on behalf of a client is the first step in building a successful control tower, followed by the almost counter intuitive understanding that by releasing day-to-day control to such a model, more control is in fact gained. The implementation of a control tower model is by no means easy, but once done correctly, unlocks immense value. By identifying a partner to implement such a hub and then allowing such to manage all the necessary steps (and exceptions) in real-time, the benefit for all within the value chain network will result in a competitive advantage in an increasingly complex supply chain environment, and indeed, global marketplace.

According to Inbound Logistics Much like air traffic controllers, 4PLs guide transportation operations, manage product flow, and sometimes help avert disaster.

Why is the flight delayed? Where is the aircraft? When will it arrive? At one time or another, everyone asks these questions. But answers rarely come fast enough from detail-oriented airline attendants, and arrival and departure boards don’t display the specifics.

Above the fray, however, a wealth of real-time information crisscrosses the skies at mach speed. With sweeping panoramas of runways and airspace, and constant contact among airlines and airport authorities, air traffic controllers always know what’s going on. They have visibility and communication. They have control. Shippers and consignees often have similar questions and shared challenges trying to uncover answers deep within complex global networks.
It’s why some seek control-tower visibility by partnering with fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) and lead logistics providers (LLPs) that can broadly glean and communicate data among myriad supply chain partners.
The more they see, the better businesses can cope with exceptions, identify redundancies, create synergies, and communicate details to logistics operations on the ground. THE 4PL EVOLUTION If this distillation sounds over-simplified, consider how the 4PL concept evolved. In 1996, Accenture (then Andersen Consulting) divined the idea after consolidating, then managing, a multinational company’s freight forwarder base. Strip away the marketing artifice of a neatly coined acronym and you’re left with a supply chain contractor barking out assignments and looking for answers from a motley logistics crew. In theory, not much has changed during the past 15 years. In practice, however, the idea of creating multi-tiered supply chain networks administered by one point of control is picking up pace. As best-of-breed outsourcing— in terms of transportation and logistics function, vertical specialization, technology sophistication, and geographic coverage— continues to grow and add layers of complexity to the extended value chain, visibility and accountability need to be centralized in a common nexus. Among 1PLs (shippers), 2PLs (asset-based carriers), and 3PLs (functional service providers), 4PLs and LLPs are the newest débutantes at the supply chain party. They are sophisticated and Socratic, yet oddly plebeian as logistics service providers go. Fourth-party logistics is an elite outsourcing capability that is shared by many a common 3PL. Nearly 75 percent of 3PLs provide lead logistics and 4PL capabilities, according to Inbound Logistics’ 2010 3PL Perspectives market research report, which surveyed more than 300 service providers. Outsourcing in general provides shippers with the means to gain better control of transportation and logistics operations and costs. As 3PLs seek to grow their value proposition, they are investing in technologies, services, and new locations to help take customers beyond tactical optimization to strategic business process improvement. They are taking the lead by chasing demand. What makes the 4PL model so fluid is that the idea is in constant flux. Shippers want customized outsourcing solutions that float between non-asset-based objectivity and tactical execution. Demand is engineering how 3PLs, 4PLs, and LLPs continue to evolve in an overlapping triple-helix process of convergence and separation. DISTILLING THE FOURTH ELEMENT A number of factors inside and outside the enterprise make 4PL-managed networks effective. At the root, businesses want more authority over operational costs. Using a supply chain management strategy that targets silo optimization, without sacrificing end-to-end visibility and control, presents an obvious advantage. “A company’s willingness to consider a 4PL arrangement is due to internal cost pressures and the strategic importance of logistics activities,” says Dr. Juergen Rahtz, senior vice president, lead logistics solutions for Kuehne + Nagel, a Switzerland-based 3PL. “Internal pressures can include changes within the organization such as an acquisition, divestiture, new market or product introduction, and supply strategy and management.” MEETING MARKET DEMANDS Apart from these corporate-driven impulses, market pressures such as fuel cost increases and capacity restrictions can trigger a similar need for 4PL partnerships. As a recent example, the recession presented ripe conditions for businesses to consider hierarchical outsourcing strategies capable of flexing with, and absorbing, market volatility. More specifically, companies needed a widespread agent that could effect positive change across the supply chain. “Companies may have well-organized and optimized customer-facing distribution, but limited control over their inbound supply chains, potentially buying from suppliers on a landed cost basis, thereby missing opportunities to un-bundle part price and logistics expense, for example,” says Rahtz. “They can gain better control of the logistics spend and execution through a 4PL.” At the same time, decreased product life cycles and inventory carrying costs can also be supported through global direct-ship and build-to-order models that need very tight order and transportation management, using merge-in-transit and crossdocking to achieve reliable, short lead times. A global 4PL or lead logistics provider allows companies to react faster to trade swings— and more quickly and efficiently than relying on a disparate band of service providers that are optimizing logistics functions in situ. The inevitable costs and inefficiencies of doing so without proper oversight are prohibitive. “It takes talent and time to establish a proven network,” explains Matt Lewis, director, global logistics for Armonk, N.Y.-based IBM. “When these two variables are not aligned to provide a response to a competitive opportunity, the 4PL model can be an excellent alternative.” The technology and consulting firm knows this firsthand. In 2008, IBM divested its global logistics arm to Geodis Wilson. As part of the agreement, the French 3PL (with U.S. headquarters in Iselin, N.J.) became IBM’s sole lead logistics provider, managing the company’s worldwide asset recovery services, service parts logistics, and flow management of all hardware and software products. The strategic move was an effort to separate non-core transportation and logistics functions so that IBM could focus on its primary business. “The 4PL model is, at its core, variable and flexible, so it provides many C-suite executives with an alternative, especially when capital is tight,” says Lewis. “IBM has developed a perspective that logistics is critical to our overall business success, but it should not be a strategic investment area for the company. “Logistics is important in our demanding global supply chain; however, it is of significantly greater value to have a 4PL partner such as Geodis to provide the operational expertise and make the required investments,” he adds. “This allows IBM to invest in its core businesses and let our logistics partner make the necessary outlay to keep its logistics capabilities world-class.” For some industries, the transition to a 4PL-managed outsourcing model has simply been a matter of time. Automotive, for example, has a legacy in regionalizing supply chain networks to more quickly source, manufacture, and assemble a wide array of moving parts just-in-time. Decentralization is a common strategy for locating resources closer to demand, thereby increasing responsiveness and time to market, and reducing transportation costs. Over the past few years, supply chain localization has become a favored approach for consumer product industries as well, especially where demand sensitivity is a competitive differentiator. “Many large multinational companies are decentralized and operate on different ERP systems. Therefore, they have difficulty gaining supply chain efficiencies across the entire enterprise,” explains Rahtz. “A 4PL can be the integrator for multiple business units and geographies, and be a change management agent.” WHAT RIGHT LOOKS LIKE Locally or globally, technology integration and compliance can stimulate a change in how businesses organize supply chain networks. Some 3PLs have become de facto 4PLs because of their IT sophistication, serving up proprietary logistics solutions to other service providers who leverage these capabilities among their own shipping customers. Transportation management and freight brokerage are other areas where 3PL asset and expertise stratification has allowed for multi-tiered partnerships. But even these instances offer only a small slice of what 4PLs are truly capable of. Many global 3PLs see the lead logistics role as an opportunity to help customers understand the value proposition of outsourcing by making functional improvement more strategic— by integrating logistics best practices across the supply chain. “The 4PL establishes what ‘right’ looks like for any part of the supply chain,” says Carl Fowler, senior director of operations, and leader of Menlo Logistics’ 4PL practice in Fremont, Calif. “4PLs use analytical tools and processes to assess supply chain design and performance, identify disconnects, and define the optimum supply chain design based on changing economic, market, and business conditions, and customer demand. “The ‘set it and forget it’ methodology is a common trap companies fall into, whether it’s a business line, region, or global,” he continues. “As a 4PL, we first establish a true understanding of how the supply chain machine works, then find ways to lean it out and optimize it. “Next, we put measures and controls in place so we can identify and understand when a problem is occurring. Once identified, we adjust or tweak the machine to return performance to optimum levels. This experience is true across all industries,” Fowler says. Put simply: the 3PL is the logistics engineer; the 4PL/LLP is the supply chain strategist; and in between, customer demand takes all parties in any number of directions. From its inception, the 4PL model was meant to control variability. There’s no greater variable than globalization, and as a consequence, multinational businesses have been likely disciples of 4PL and LLP outsourcing strategies. “For companies with a well-developed logistics organization and proven global processes that have maximized their value in terms of control and scale, the 4PL model provides an opportunity to expand that value by playing on a much larger field, and therefore providing greater economies of scale,” says IBM’s Lewis. CENTRALIZED CONTROL From an organizational perspective, it makes sense to have centralized strategic command over localized day-to-day operations. When you expand this business model globally and across multiple vertical organizations, a horizontal layer of control— driven by technology, geography, or corporate governance— is often compulsory. Different cultural dynamics around the world shade how businesses approach organizational hierarchy. The 4PL idea has been more widely accepted and adopted in Europe and among global supply chain networks than as a pure-play U.S. solution. Culture, politics, business practices, and geography are primary reasons for this divergence. “From a cultural perspective, U.S. companies are less willing to give up control over carriers than European companies,” says Rahtz. “In Asia, local companies are less agreeable to outsourced management services. They focus instead on transactional execution.” DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS Europe and Asia have social structures that are far different than the United States, and these differences sometimes place their definitions of fourth-party logistics at odds. “In Europe, a 4PL is typically defined as a manager of other service providers. Transportation management, for example, is often considered a 4PL activity,” says Fowler. “In the United States, we view transportation management as a 3PL engagement that is less strategic and more tactical. “The 4PL may operate parts of a supply chain, but its primary objective is to create and implement a comprehensive strategy based on the continuous flow of value and removal of waste in a supply chain,” he continues. Lewis agrees there are fundamental distinctions between U.S. and European perspectives, but believes the reason is less cultural and more operational. “The development of pan-European logistics capabilities has been rapid and largely successful based on business and economic drivers rather than any type of social-driven requirement,” he explains. “The complexity of cross-border logistics in Europe is the perfect microcosm for a global 4PL model, and that is why we see far greater readiness in Europe compared to the United States. “This was the path of IBM’s 4PL logistics evolution. We tested it in Europe for several years with Geodis, then took it to the global level once the proven capabilities were in place,” adds Lewis. Operating in multiple countries and managing a supply chain that needs to be much more global is a complicated proposition often not found in the United States. The 4PL concept is more acceptable in Europe because supply chains have to deal with inter-country trading. The European Union has helped standardized currency and Customs policy but there are still inconsistencies— taxation, infrastructure, logistics expertise, and leadership— among the 27 member states and countries outside the trading bloc. “If we look at overland-based supply chains, the U.S. market is much more homogenous than Europe, and the 4PL holds less value compared with the European distribution model,” says Rahtz. “Most of our 4PL and LLP services growth occurs with global or multi-region supply chains.” For Fowler, the difference in the United States is mass and concentration. “The sheer flow through the supply chain is greater than other countries, so service providers have to support different types of supply chain dynamics,” he says. TUNING THE SUPPLY CHAIN What’s remarkable about the 4PL/LLP evolution is that wildfire anticipation and tepid acceptance created a supply chain legend long before it even came of age. As with just-in-time, the 4PL idea grew up as a rarified component of complex, parts-driven industries. It had its merit. Beyond these instances, however, it was viewed as yet another layer of unnecessary bureaucracy. That opinion is swiftly changing— about as quickly as outsourcing companies redefine 4PL and LLP expectations. Equally significant, these managed supply chain arrangements vary widely. Outsourcers and 3PLs alike are creative in how they spin and execute the concept. This fluidity is appealing to some; to others it is hard to grasp. For example, Kuehne + Nagel’s lead logistics service portfolio covers three different areas at the two boundaries of outsourcing: on one end, it provides integrated managed services as a 3PL and managed services as an LLP; and, on the other, neutral 4PL services that do not include any 3PL activities. “What makes it hard to grasp is that there are models in between where customers are looking for an integrated LLP, but also want to keep certain 3PLs or carriers and have those managed in a neutral model,” says Rahtz. “The advantage of this flexibility is that a 4PL/LLP can provide a customized solution that fits specific customer needs and can accommodate cultural or regional differences.” 4PL-managed outsourcing isn’t for every company. But for consumer-facing businesses sensitive to shifts in consumption, and where supply chain decentralization has become a preferred strategy for pulling product to demand and reducing total logistics costs, the 4PL is the logistics model of the future. “No matter how demand-driven an industry is, a 4PL partnership can help companies better understand, respond to, manage, and measure challenges and changes— then adjust to keep their supply chain in tune by eliminating waste, reducing costs, and operating at the optimum level necessary for the business,” says Fowler. “The 4PL is the conductor of the orchestra, making sure that all the instruments are playing along to the same song sheet.” Keeping the supply chain in tune is a shared objective at IBM. “Our 4PL model is analogous to a symphony conductor,” notes Lewis. “Geodis stands at the global podium and orchestrates function across all the various logistics service providers in a way that balances customer and supply chain requirements and results in satisfied clients and repeat business for IBM.” However industry or media attempts to spin the 4PL model, there’s no getting around the fact that logistics service providers of all sizes are playing to a growing audience. Precision and harmony go hand-in-hand with visibility and control. In time, there will be different flight patterns for global outsourcing and new entrants will shake up the establishment. But receptive shippers will always expect another encore from their 4PLs.